Justin Sun's Response to Being Blacklisted: The address in question was only used for small-scale testing and was not involved in any buying or selling.

September 7th. In Wuxi City, Jiangsu Province, China, the Intermediate People's Court disclosed a dismissed case related to investment in "virtual US dollars." An overseas exchange platform, A, publicly promoted "about 7% monthly returns" and claimed that users could view their earnings in the platform account and withdraw funds at any time. Subsequently, Zhou Ming entrusted Wang Hao to purchase foreign exchange assets on Platform A and transferred 84,350 yuan to him. On the same day, Wang Hao transferred the 13,000 yuan worth of platform US dollars exchanged by Zhou Ming into Zhou Ming's platform account. Unexpectedly, Platform A suddenly collapsed, and the 13,000 US dollars in Zhou Ming's account could only be cashed out as 0.1 yuan in Chinese currency. In an attempt to recover the loss, Zhou Ming filed a lawsuit with the court, demanding that Wang Hao return his principal of 84,350 yuan and pay the corresponding fund occupation fee. The court, after hearing the case, held that Zhou

On September 7th, according to on-chain analyst Ai Yi (@ai_9684xtpa), the address 0x1fc...FAEd5 withdrew 2329 ETH from Binance 15 minutes ago at an average price of $4293. Furthermore, the whale added 5622 ETH and $2.81 million in two-sided liquidity to Uniswap V4. The total assets of this address are worth $71.59 million.

On September 7th, according to Andy, the founder of The Rollup. Fidelity's launched an on-chain tokenized fund product called Fidelity Digital Interest Token (FDIT), which has exceeded $200 million in size and is poised to challenge BlackRock's BUIDL.

On September 7th, Ryan Fang, the growth lead of WLFI, stated in an interview on Thursday night that, "The WLFI team holds the view that certain whale token holders might have manipulated the price with the intention of locking in profits. The WLFI team is firmly convinced that in a world where a centralized exchange holds a substantial amount of user funds, some exchanges may attract user tokens and actually transfer the user tokens (referring to WLFI tokens) to other exchanges for sale. Once again, we are still in the process of exploring and discovering this issue and believe that the above situation is highly likely to have occurred. Now, let's imagine this: suppose a large exchange holds a significant amount of user assets and transfers a large quantity of user assets to another exchange that may have better liquidity, while also opening a very large short position. This is a possibility." "In fact, on Thursday, some community members have been notifying the team that they believe

On September 7th, according to the monitoring of @mlmabc, 8 hours ago, a16z received 1,428,000 HYPE from Anchorage Digital, with a value of $66.6 million.

On September 7th, according to on-chain analyst Ai Yi (@ai_9684xtpa), the whale address "0x54d...e6029" purchased ETH at $4710 and is currently engaging in dollar-cost averaging. This address had previously bought 1354 ETH at $4282 (approximately $5.8 million). After this additional purchase, the average price for 3477 ETH has dropped to $4543. Currently, the address has an unrealized loss of $841,000.