Lookonchain APP

App Store

What If You Bought $100K of BTC vs ETH in 2017? The Results Are Brutal for ETH Holders

Alec Bakhouch
/2025.04.11 00:19:19
If you invested $100K in BTC vs ETH in 2017, BTC would now be worth $2M, while ETH just $375K—a 7x difference. While Bitcoin stayed true to its vision, Ethereum pivoted multiple times and faced deeper drawdowns. The conclusion? BTC delivered higher returns, less drama, and stronger long-term certainty.

You bought $100k of Bitcoin or Ethereum in Sept 2017.
It’s now 2025.
How bad was the decision to buy ETH instead? 
I ran the real numbers.... and it's rough for ETH holders 🧵👇

The setup:
• Bitcoin (BTC) price in Sept 2017 = $4,000
• Ethereum (ETH) price in Sept 2017 = $400

Your $100k investment would have bought:
• 25 BTC
• 250 ETH

Pretty even math. But the outcomes?
Wildly different.

Today’s prices:
• BTC ≈ $80,000
• ETH ≈ $1,500

So today your stack would be worth:
• 25 BTC × $80,000 = $2,000,000
• 250 ETH × $1,500 = $375,000

Bitcoin turned $100k into $2M.
Ethereum turned $100k into $375k.

Simple ROI:
• Bitcoin = +1,900%
• Ethereum = +275%

In other words:
Bitcoin outperformed Ethereum by 7x.
And that’s before considering risk.
Let’s talk about that…

• Bitcoin = 1 chain, 1 mission, 1 monetary policy.
• Ethereum = hard forks, experiments, pivots.

Ethereum went from:
• PoW → PoS
• “World Computer” → “Settlement Layer” → “Everything Chain” → “Restaking Casino”
If you bought ETH in 2017, you’re not holding the same asset anymore.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin has done exactly what it promised:
• Stayed decentralized
• Stayed predictable
• Stayed unstoppable

No pivots. 
No drama. (Only on Twitter 😂)
No Hard Forks. (Blocksize Wars) 
That’s the whole point.

Volatility hits differently too:
• Bitcoin had -84% drawdowns
• Ethereum had -95% drawdowns 

Bitcoin punished weak hands.
Ethereum obliterated them.
Almost nobody rode ETH from 2017 → 2025 without getting wrecked along the way.

Today’s momentum:
• Bitcoin = Clear regulatory approval, ETFs, sovereign accumulation, global money narrative, corporate adoption. 
• Ethereum = Fighting for relevance vs alt-L1s, regulatory scrutiny, endless scaling issues. 

Bitcoin keeps winning bigger battles.
Ethereum keeps trying to reinvent itself.

The real conclusion:
In 2017, Bitcoin looked "boring" and "old."
In 2025, Bitcoin looks inevitable.
Meanwhile, Ethereum looks more and more like Silicon Valley tech — trendy, fragile, replaceable.
You don’t build generational wealth chasing experiments.
You build it by owning certainty.

Summary:
• $100k BTC in 2017 → $2M
• $100k ETH in 2017 → $375k

It’s not even close.
Bitcoin didn’t just protect your wealth better.
It multiplied it better.
And the best part?
The next 10 years will be even bigger.
Stack accordingly. 🧠

Relevant content
Dumb Money Wealth Cycles: Why Crypto Twitter Feels Miserable in Q4 2025

From ICOs to NFTs to memes, every crypto cycle birthed an era where “dumb money” got rich fast. But after nine months of stagnation and no new wealth engine, the casino’s gone quiet. Without a new mania, CT isn’t bearish—it’s just bored.

IcoBeast.eth/17 minutes ago

How I Made $1,500 Risk-Free on Polymarket by Exploiting Bot Incentives

By spotting illiquid Harmonix markets on Polymarket, I exploited rebalancing bots chasing USDC rewards. With just $100, I repeatedly trapped their auto-orders between bid-ask spreads—earning $1,500 in two hours, completely risk-free.

toto/2 days ago

The $48 Billion Math Error: Why Strategy Inc.s Bitcoin Empire May Collapse Within 90 Days

Strategy Inc. controls 3.26% of all Bitcoin but faces a liquidity cliff. With $54M cash, $700M annual dividends, collapsing equity premiums, and potential MSCI index exclusion, it risks forced BTC sales that could shatter both its model and the market.

Shanaka Anslem Perera /2 days ago

The $2 Trillion Whiplash: Inside the Fastest Market Reversal Since “Liberation Day”

In just five hours, the SP 500 erased $2T in market cap as Nvidia flipped from +6% to -3% despite record earnings. No headline caused it—extreme leverage, binary AI-driven sentiment, and record margin debt triggered a mechanical, fear-fueled reversal.

The Kobeissi Letter/6 days ago

Stables Are Not Stable: How the Stream Finance Collapse Exposed DeFi’s Structural Illusion of Safety

The implosion of Stream Finance’s xUSD and its contagion across DeFi wasn’t a hack—it was systemic failure. Recursive leverage, fake transparency, and circular dependencies revealed a harsh truth: DeFi’s “stable” yield is built on fragility and denial.

YQ/2025.11.20

Why Your Coin Isn’t Pumping: The End of the Beginning for Crypto Valuations

Crypto got everything it asked for—ETFs, regulation, adoption—and prices still fell. The truth: most tokens trade at absurd multiples on casino-style revenue. Until real users and recurring value emerge, this isn’t a bull market—it’s a reality check.

Santiago R Santos/2025.11.19