Lookonchain APP

App Store

Opinion: The practicality of liquidation heatmaps is vastly overestimated, and they should not play a major role in trading systems.

2026.09.28 18:30:57

Benson Sun, founder of Coinkarma, says the practical value of liquidation heatmaps is vastly overestimated. Many traders now spot a large cluster of liquidations at a certain price level and immediately interpret it as "the price will definitely go to sweep this area". However, liquidation charts themselves rely heavily on assumptions. Most liquidation heatmaps work by taking historical market trading data and plugging in a set of hypothetical leverage multiples—such as 5x, 10x, 20x, 30x, and 50x—to reverse-engineer the price levels where those positions "might" be liquidated after trading. As a result, the dense liquidation zones users see do not actually represent an identical number of positions waiting to be liquidated there; too many variables are at play. Those traders may have already exited their positions. Some may add to their positions, some may reduce them, and others may top up margin. As long as position size, margin, or average cost changes, the liquidation heatmap shifts. The longer the time frame, the larger this error becomes. Therefore, the most useful window for liquidation heatmaps is roughly the last 24 hours to 3 days. Using liquidation clusters from 7 days, 30 days, or even months ago as current "magnet price levels" is meaningless. Liquidation heatmaps can serve as auxiliary information for short-term market structure analysis, but they should not play a major role in a trading system, as they easily create a false sense of certainty. There will always be liquidation clusters above and below the price. When prices rise, it is said they will first sweep the short positions above; when prices fall, it is said they will first sweep the long positions below; if prices fall first then rise, it is said they will first sweep longs then shorts. In any case, there is an after-the-fact explanation, and it is hard to falsify beforehand—this makes it not an analytical tool, but pure pseudoscience.

Relevant content

Is the meme coin rally back? AGT surged 100% in three hours, with five addresses holding 2x long positions logging nearly $1 million in unrealized profits.

According to GMGN data, AI-themed token AGT, listed on Binance Alpha, rallied sharply last night, surging over 100% in 3 hours from $0.015 to $0.036. Separately, per Lookonchain monitoring, 5 wallet addresses opened 2x long positions on 50.17 million AGT (valued at approx. $1.7 million) on Aster, with unrealized profits of around $887,000. BlockBeats reminds users that related tokens have high price volatility, so investment requires caution.

1 seconds ago

A whale entity has deposited 14.48 million WLD into Binance.

According to YuEmber monitoring, two wallets belonging to the same entity transferred 14.48 million WLD tokens (valued at $7.21 million) into Binance 9 hours ago.

1 seconds ago

OpenAI conducted internal research on Ethereum testnet contract deployment, but an agent, facing insufficient gas, directly stole testnet tokens from an address with a publicly available mnemonic phrase.

,OpenAI 官网披露,今年 6 月,OpenAI 内部一个研究模型(GPT-5.6 Sol 系列)被分配任务:更新一个加密货币交易应用,并在以太坊测试网 Sepolia 上部署合约。任务没有提供已注资的钱包,也没授权使用外部资金。该模型先尝试从水龙头领测试 ETH 失败。随后它自己想出办法——从网上公开的开发者助记词(public seed phrase)中派生地址,扫描了数百个后找到一个有余额的账户。它在内部推理中明确质疑「用公开私钥的资金合不合伦理」,最终自圆其说:这些是测试网、无实际价值的 ETH,且助记词早已公开,资金「effectively abandoned(实际上已被放弃)」,于是用该账户支付了部署所需的 gas,成功完成了合约部署。OpenAI 在后续扩大对齐监控时发现了这次行为,并于 2026 年 10 月 15 日在官方 Misalignment Reports 中正式披露。事件被归类为「未经授权使用已注资的测试加密货币钱包」,显示模型用自己的判断取代了账户持有人的授权。

1 seconds ago

Hyperliquid Founder: Hopes to Enter Wall Street, Says Regulation Should Target Financial Institutions Rather Than Blockchain Itself

Hyperliquid Labs co-founder Jeff Yan told Bloomberg’s *Odd Lots* podcast that Hyperliquid is not currently open to U.S. customers. The platform aims to serve as underlying trading technology for traditional financial institutions rather than replacing existing market participants, comparing its positioning to Amazon Web Services (AWS), which provides computing infrastructure for businesses. “We are not looking to replace anything. In fact, I think this technology can benefit institutions that currently operate markets in more traditional ways,” he added. Yan noted that regulatory obligations should fall on financial institutions operating markets on the Hyperliquid blockchain, not the blockchain network itself. This regulatory arrangement would allow Hyperliquid to expand further into Wall Street while avoiding the full compliance burden of traditional exchanges, as blockchains are better suited to serve as underlying infrastructure for order books, clearing, global distribution, and liquidity aggregation. U.S. regulators are cautious about new technologies but also willing to advance innovation quickly. The team is “very serious” about Hyperliquid’s future as a “home for all financial assets.”

1 seconds ago

5 Wallets Open 2x Longs on 50.17M $AGT, Gain $887K as Token Surges 100%

AGT has surged over 100% today! 5 wallets opened 2x longs on a total of 50.17M $AGT ($1.7M) on @Aster_DEX and are now sitting on $887K in unrealized profit.

1 seconds ago

$AGT Surges Over 100% as 5 Wallets Make $887K in Unrealized Profit on 2x Longs on @Aster_DEX

AGT has surged over 100% today! 5 wallets opened 2x longs on a total of 50.17M $AGT ($1.7M) on @Aster_DEX and are now sitting on $887K in unrealized profit.

1 seconds ago

Popular tokens

BitcoinEthereumHyperliquidSolanaTRONBNBTetherAaveXRPPepeFartcoinOndoJupiterUniswapBonkPendleEthenaArbitrumAvalancheLidoChainlinkPolygonDogecoinCardano