Lookonchain APP

App Store

Ethereum (ETH) — Onchain News & Whale Tracking

Real-time Ethereum whale movements, exchange flows and onchain findings tracked by Lookonchain. 3491 updates and counting.

2026.11.15 19:37

Perspective: Guard against misjudgments of Ethereum Foundation address ownership; incorrect wallet tagging may exacerbate market panic.

On-chain analyst Specter published a post stating that rumors of the Ethereum Foundation selling ETH have been swirling in the market recently, but the attribution of some related wallets lacks sufficient evidence. Taking a wallet marked as an address linked to the foundation as an example, Specter noted that while its early fund flows can be traced back to Ethereum Foundation-related addresses, it has gone through multiple transfers between independent entities in between. This wallet has participated in DeFi activities including BAT ICO, Compound, and Maker, with over 3,400 cumulative transactions, aligning more with the profile of an independent investor long involved in ICOs and DeFi. It cannot be deemed an Ethereum Foundation wallet solely based on early fund associations. Early ETH allocations may be payments to engineers or team members, or may involve private transactions or over-the-counter purchases by investors. The Ethereum Foundation disclosed in January 2016 that it conducted a private sale of ETH worth roughly $650,000 to individuals and enterprises, so the relevant funds may also stem from such transactions. Historical transaction links do not prove that two addresses are held or controlled by the same entity. Directly labeling all wallets that have had fund flows with foundation addresses as team wallets lacks sufficient basis, and could even spark unnecessary market panic. Reliable wallet attribution judgments should combine on-chain tracking with independent off-chain evidence.

2026.11.10 15:18

An Ethereum address dormant for 11 years was hit by a hacker's "poisoning attack" just three minutes after it came back online.

A wallet address starting with 0x7dD, traceable to Ethereum’s 2015 genesis block, made its first external transfer of 0.05 ETH (worth ~$106) at 6:04 AM Beijing Time on the 10th. The test receiving address starts with 0x1321beb8 and ends with 1A44. This address received its first ETH in the July 2015 genesis block and another 755 ETH in March 2016, with no external transfers made prior to this transaction. On-chain monitoring account Whale Alert flagged the test transfer. Within roughly three minutes of the test transfer being sent, the old wallet received multiple small ETH deposits from two addresses mimicking the target receiving address: one starting with 0x13211f, the other with 0x1321FB, both ending in 1A44. Etherscan data shows the accounts funding these two addresses are labeled “Fake_Phishing”, with the more active one sending 43 dust transfers. This tactic, called address poisoning, involves attackers inserting nearly identical addresses into target transaction records, tricking holders into copying the wrong address from recent logs and transferring large sums. At 6:20 AM Beijing Time, the new address sent 0.01 ETH, with nearly all of it returned about three minutes later. Then at 6:42 AM Beijing Time—roughly 38 minutes after the initial test transfer—the old wallet transferred 2,154.94 ETH (valued at ~$4.6 million) to the correct 0x1321beb8 address. The new address currently holds around 2,155 ETH. In January this year, Citigroup warned that address poisoning spam transactions had inflated Ethereum’s network transaction count, with many transfers worth less than $1.

2026.11.10 08:41

Vitalik Buterin is embroiled in a legal dispute tied to the Ethereum Foundation, whose internal documents contained offensive jokes including references to seppuku. A cancer-stricken employee who led a boycott against the foundation was fired and subsequently filed a lawsuit.

The Ethereum Foundation distributed its organizational mission and direction document "EF Mandate" to employees in February this year. Page 11 of the document features the "Source Seppuku License", a section presented as an anime-style illustration with a winking character, yellow cat, and other elements. The text in this section implies that authors, maintainers, editors, or distributors who fail to uphold open source commitments or modify the license must "take their own life with a sword". The content drew strong opposition from some staff, with around 79 employees voting to remove the relevant text. Foundation management clarified that the line was not literal, and updated a commitment document to note it was "unrelated to literal seppuku". Even so, the version released on March 13 still retained the content, which was subsequently written to the Ethereum blockchain. Employee Fulton and colleagues organized a joint letter signed by 53 members of the Protocol cluster, stating they supported the foundation’s direction but rejected the mandatory commitment terms. Later, on March 24, Fulton notified management in writing of her ovarian cancer diagnosis, and was fired roughly 13 days later (another joint letter organizer, Trent Van Epps, was also dismissed the same day). Fulton has since filed a lawsuit in Colorado, accusing the Ethereum Foundation, Vitalik, and other executives of retaliatory termination, disability discrimination, and interference with medical leave.

2026.11.09 10:30

Ethereum EIP-8488 Draft: Implements "Old-New Cutoff" for Gas Pricing, Introduces Versioned Opcodes

The Ethereum community has recently submitted a draft Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) 8488, titled "Versioned Opcodes for Gas Repricing". The proposal’s core idea is to introduce a parallel set of V2 opcodes, whose gas costs will follow new pricing standards outlined in EIP-8037 and EIP-8038. The draft stipulates that after network activation, newly deployed contracts can only include V2 opcodes, with their version number written during verification. The new cross-contract call instruction requires the target contract to also be a V2 version; otherwise, the call will fail. To completely separate new and old rules, the V2 opcode set has removed instructions like GAS and GASLIMIT that expose internal gas metrics, preventing new contracts from hardcoding old gas consumption logic. All existing legacy contracts will continue to operate under the old gas schedule indefinitely. The motivation behind the draft is to resolve a contradiction facing the current upgrade: directly rolling out the new gas rules in full would heavily impact existing contracts that rely on old gas invariants, while delaying or scrapping the new rules would delay EIPs designed to control state growth and significantly raise the gas limit. EIP-8488 offers a third path: new bytecodes use the new pricing, old contracts remain unaffected, and upgradable systems will migrate naturally when replacing implementations. As the share of V2 executions rises and state growth becomes manageable in the future, Ethereum’s gas limit can be gradually increased. The proposal’s authors stated that the underlying structure of deployed contracts should not be altered due to post-hoc gas price adjustments. To decouple pricing from application functionality, new contracts should not hardcode internal gas pricing into their logic. Currently, the proposal is in an early draft stage.

Page 1 / 70 Next →

Popular tokens

BitcoinEthereumHyperliquidSolanaTRONBNBTetherAaveXRPPepeFartcoinOndoJupiterUniswapBonkPendleEthenaArbitrumAvalancheLidoChainlinkPolygonDogecoinCardano