Lookonchain APP

App Store

Ethereum (ETH) — Onchain News & Whale Tracking

Real-time Ethereum whale movements, exchange flows and onchain findings tracked by Lookonchain. 3191 updates and counting.

2026.09.02 18:29

A derivatives contract whale aggressively shorted Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and US stocks, emerging as the largest short seller across 14 US stock assets.

According to TradingBeats monitoring, whale address "VBVIT" has recently aggressively shorted BTC, ETH, and XYZ100, an asset linked to the US Nasdaq 100. As of 17:41 Hong Kong time on September 2, the address’s total positions in these three short contracts amount to approximately $107.5 million, with an unrealized profit of around $2.4535 million. Per TradingBeats’ current short position size rankings, the address ranks as the 3rd largest short seller of BTC, 8th largest short seller of ETH, and 2nd largest short seller of XYZ100. Specifically, the address holds roughly 839.45 BTC short contracts, valued at ~$64.3196 million, using 10x leverage, with an average entry price of ~$78,146.8, and current unrealized profit of ~$1.2809 million. It also holds ~11,851.47 ETH short contracts, worth ~$28.1247 million, with 20x leverage, average entry price of ~$2,451.97, and unrealized profit of ~$934,800. Additionally, it holds ~522.16 xyz:XYZ100 short contracts, valued at ~$15.0916 million, with 20x leverage, and unrealized profit of ~$237,800. The address currently has a total of 86 positions, 60 of which are short positions, with a total short position size of ~$137 million, and overall unrealized profit of ~$2.6218 million from its short positions. It is also currently the largest short seller on Hyperliquid for multiple US stock and ETF assets, including 14 names such as ASML, IBM, AVGO, and MRVL. The address previously drew attention from the on-chain trading community for opening nearly $30 million in short positions on SPCX via Hyperliquid. Its historical win rate for completed trades stands at 48.44%.

2026.08.31 18:52

Robinhood Chain's DEX trading volume reached $1.33 billion over the past 24 hours, surpassing Ethereum, BSC, and Base networks.

According to DefiLlama data, Robinhood Chain’s 24-hour DEX trading volume hit ~$1.33 billion, marking four consecutive days of new all-time highs for daily volume. Its 7-day trading volume stood at ~$6.16 billion, with a week-over-week growth of roughly 79%. The $1.33 billion daily volume outpaced concurrent figures from Ethereum Mainnet ($993 million), BNB Chain ($962 million), and Base ($881 million), ranking second only to Solana ($1.86 billion). Notably, Robinhood Chain’s DeFi TVL is just $725 million—roughly 13% of Solana, Base, and BSC’s respective TVLs, and around 1.5% of Ethereum’s. However, driven by high meme coin trading activity, Robinhood Chain generated $1.07 million in chain fees over the past 24 hours, equal to the combined fees of Ethereum ($362,000) and Solana ($677,000) in the same period, making it the highest-fee chain across the network (excluding application layers). According to DefiLlama’s retained revenue calculations based on on-chain economic models, Robinhood Chain’s 24-hour revenue reached $963,000, far exceeding Ethereum ($70,000), Solana ($84,000), BSC ($44,000), and Base ($93,000)—three times the combined revenue of these other major public chains. This does not mean Robinhood’s overall ecosystem revenue has surpassed Solana or Ethereum, as DefiLlama’s on-chain revenue metric only measures network-level income. Robinhood Chain’s outlier revenue is essentially a result of the meme coin trading boom combined with its L2 sequencer economic model. Unlike Ethereum, Solana, BSC, and other chains, Robinhood Chain retains most user gas fees after covering Ethereum data costs and Arbitrum royalty splits, so network-level revenue is rapidly amplified when high-frequency meme coin trading surges.

2026.08.26 23:38

Ethereum plans to restructure its staking deposit contract to "update its security lock" for the post-quantum era.

An Ethereum developer has proposed a new Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) draft that aims to restructure the existing validator deposit contract, paving the way for the Ethereum staking system to transition to post-quantum cryptography. The proposal plans to replace the contract’s fixed BLS key structure with support for variable-length keys and credential data, with a single entry capped at 8192 bytes, and requires each deposit to specify the "credential scheme" used. Currently, only Scheme 0 is defined, corresponding to the existing BLS signature system; future EIPs can further establish post-quantum validator key standards. The new contract will also introduce three states: "Disabled", "BLS Enabled", and "BLS Permanently Retired". Once a system call triggers the BLS Retired state, new validator staking using the existing BLS scheme will be permanently prohibited and cannot be reactivated. The proposal remains in draft stage and is pending review by EIP editors; the contract address, deployment code, and activation time have not been finalized, and its implementation will require coordinated upgrades between Ethereum’s consensus layer and execution layer. One of the proposal’s authors, Thomas Coratger, noted that post-quantum cryptography is not a straightforward software upgrade. Current Ethereum research prioritizes hash-based signature schemes, whose stateless version has a signature size of roughly 8KB—closely matching the new contract’s 8192-byte cap. The Ethereum Foundation previously established a post-quantum security team. Relevant research indicates that over 65% of ETH is currently held in addresses with on-chain-exposed public keys, and the potential threat of quantum computing to the existing elliptic curve signature system is increasingly becoming a long-term security concern for Ethereum.

2026.08.26 10:15

Ethereum's Glamsterdam upgrade will adjust gas pricing for state operations, and a small number of contracts with hardcoded gas assumptions may need to be fixed.

The Ethereum Foundation team has released an impact assessment of gas repricing for the upcoming Glamsterdam upgrade. The upgrade includes two EIPs: EIP-8037 and EIP-8038. The former increases and standardizes the cost of creating new states, including new accounts, new storage slots, and deployed bytecode. The latter raises the cost of state access operations (such as SSTORE, SLOAD, and cold account access), making gas prices more accurately reflect actual resource consumption. State operation gas pricing has not been adjusted since the Berlin fork in 2021, while Ethereum’s state size has grown significantly, and recent increases in the gas limit have further accelerated this growth. The new pricing is based on a performance target supporting approximately a 3x increase in base throughput, and serves as a necessary prerequisite for future further hikes in the gas limit. The team evaluated the actual impact by replaying historical mainnet transactions, categorizing all transactions into four groups: most transactions are completely unaffected; some transactions still succeed but have changes in details like gas usage; some contracts run out of gas under their original limit but can complete when the limit is raised; a tiny number of contracts may still fail even with a significantly increased gas limit. This last category typically relies on hardcoded gas assumptions. Developers can check if their contracts are affected and verify fixes on the Plat?berget testnet. End users do not need to take any action, as updated wallets and infrastructure will handle the changes automatically.

Page 1 / 64 Next →

Popular tokens

BitcoinEthereumHyperliquidSolanaTRONBNBTetherAaveXRPPepeFartcoinOndoJupiterUniswapBonkPendleEthenaArbitrumAvalancheLidoChainlinkPolygonDogecoinCardano