Greek police dismantled a crypto fraud ring with over 8 million euros in funds involved.

According to TradingBeats monitoring, Hyperliquid whale address 0x936c currently holds around 14.85 million PONS short positions, with a position value of approximately $6.26 million, 2x leverage, cumulative unrealized profit of roughly $2.12 million, and a holding return rate of about 50.6%. The address added roughly 1.09 million PONS short positions today. The mark price of Hyperliquid’s PONS perpetual contract is currently around $0.42, down approximately 21.3% over the past 24 hours.

According to Glassnode’s monitoring, investors who bought Bitcoin (BTC) at high levels are now selling. Two groups of investors are in unrealized losses: those who purchased BTC 1–2 years ago hold an average cost basis of around $97,000, while those who bought 6–12 months ago have an average cost of roughly $89,000. Glassnode states that investors who acquired BTC during the 2025 bull run have recorded the highest daily average sell volume this year, whereas investors who bought during market pullbacks have not exhibited similar selling behavior.

GMGN market data shows that the Robinhood Chain project PONS has posted an 18.73% decline over the past 24 hours, with its current market capitalization standing at roughly $427 million and 24-hour trading volume around $23.9 million.

According to official announcements, Concrete (CT) is set to launch on Bitget PoolX. Users can lock BTC to participate in the airdrop of 1,111,111 CT tokens, with an individual lock-up cap of 50 BTC. The lock-up period runs from 22:00 UTC+8 on October 4 to 22:00 UTC+8 on October 12. This round of PoolX features a long-term holding bonus mechanism, where the system will provide an additional bonus based on users' minimum holding of the corresponding locked asset over the past 15 days. For more details, please refer to Bitget's official platform.

VanEck Digital Assets Research Head Matthew Sigel stated in an interview that with the rapid development of the artificial intelligence (AI) industry, the power resources and long-term power contracts held by Bitcoin miners are gaining new value. Sigel pointed out that in the past, miners’ core assets were primarily viewed as computing power and BTC production capacity, but AI data centers’ demand for large volumes of stable power is reshaping the market’s valuation of miners’ power contracts. He added that some miners have signed 10-to-20-year long-term power lease agreements with investment-grade counterparties, and these contracts are granting miners "optionality"—a value distinct from pure BTC exposure. The AI sector’s growth is making power an increasingly scarce resource, so miners with low-cost, long-term locked power supplies may unlock new business opportunities, including transitions to AI infrastructure. On the Bitcoin market front, current signs of seller fatigue suggest investors should focus on opportunities following pullbacks. Additionally, Sigel compared the roles of gold and Bitcoin in investment portfolios, arguing Bitcoin may continue to expand its market share going forward. He also discussed the potential impact of quantum computing on the Bitcoin network, noting that quantum computing is a long-term risk to monitor but not yet a reason for investors to sell BTC. VanEck remains bullish on Bitcoin adoption trends, and views Bitcoin reaching a certain percentage of the gold market capitalization as one key future valuation reference.

PONS founder Ozzy (@MEADGod) responded to community users’ questions about its buyback-and-burn mechanism and apologized for misunderstandings in prior communications. Earlier, user yyy posted inquiries about PONS’ buyback system, including whether escrow account funds needed to be manually transferred to the buyback allocator, why funds had not entered the allocator for over five days, the current buyback-and-burn rate of roughly $120,000 per day, and whether the promised automatic escrow fund claim feature had been implemented. Ozzy acknowledged some of the questions were valid, noting the buyback-and-burn rate had not yet been adjusted and the "claim" process had not been fully decentralized. He explained the team is conducting a contract upgrade, with the new buyback mechanism designed to execute fund claims every seven days, followed by using the claimed funds for buybacks and burns over the subsequent seven days in a continuous cycle. Currently, all buyback and burn operations are fully automated; anyone can trigger a bot to perform these actions and earn a small reward. The primary adjustment needed now is the buyback-and-burn rate. The previous rate was set at 2e per hour, which, combined with the roughly $950,000 in the Splitter (fund-splitting contract) and the seven-day cycle, aligned with the current fund size. Additionally, fund claims will run automatically every seven days, and future buyback funds will be displayed in two sections: the Active Buyback Vault (for ongoing buybacks) and funds reserved for the next cycle. Ozzy thanked the community for their feedback and again apologized for responding before fully grasping the issues. Community user yyy subsequently accepted the apology, stating that a more decentralized and automated claim and buyback-and-burn mechanism is a critical foundation for building community trust.